Jewish leaders were scrambling this week to figure out how they would be affected by Governor Eliot Spitzer’s executive order banning junkets for executive branch officials sponsored by outside groups.

Spitzer on Monday banned members of his administration from accepting any gift – including support-building missions to Israel – that might permit the inference of being intended “to influence the individual in the performance of official business.”

After a Jewish Week inquiry Tuesday [January 2], Michael Miller, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) of New York, said he would review the matter to see if it could impact JCRC’s annual missions to Israel.

Although those delegations most often consist of ethnic community leaders, clergy, key city and state legislators, they have also included appointed members of state government.

“We are looking into whether this poses a problem,” said Miller. “We need to engage in a discussion with our counsel and with people in the administration.”

A comment from Spitzer’s press office was not immediately available on Tuesday.

Miller did not recall how many appointed administration officials have participated in JCRC missions over the years, but mentioned as one Elizabeth Moore, then a counsel to Governor Mario Cuomo in the early 1990s and now a member of Spitzer’s transition team.

Since 1982, United Jewish Appeal-Federation of New York and its beneficiary, the Jewish Community Relations Council, have taken more than 500 community leaders, elected officials and/or their staff members to Israel to learn about and better understand the economic, political and security challenges.

By providing these leaders first-hand exposure to Mideast realities as seen by Israelis, the missions serve both short- and long-term goals: planting seeds of support in communities across the area and investing goodwill among local officials who may one day have their hands on foreign policy. Some of the local officials treated to an Israel trip have gone on to become members of Congress.

Support for Israel in Albany has also produced some tangible benefits for the Jewish state: New York operates a business office in Jerusalem to explore trade potential, and the state’s pension fund routinely invests in Israel Bonds.

Jerry Goldfeder, an election lawyer and Democratic activist, said he doubted that such missions would be construed as an attempt to sway state policy.

“If it’s purely an educational trip for members of government to know and understand the State of Israel and people of Israel, I can’t imagine anyone would perceive that as trying to influence governmental policy,” he said. He added, “the impulse to reform is extremely important, but may have unintended consequences.”

Spitzer’s reform isn’t the only measure causing concern in the pro-Israel community. On the federal level, the fervor among the new Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill to restrict lobbyist-sponsored perks for members of Congress caused concern at American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobby. But leaders there are reportedly satisfied with measures that would allow delegations to foreign countries, with pre-approval and post-trip debriefing by ethics committee members.

The other reform orders signed by Spitzer on Tuesday post new restrictions on lobbying, further limit the use of state resources – such as vehicles and computers – by employees and bar candidates from appearing in state commercials.

Ron Soloway, UJA-Federation’s managing director for governmental and external relations, said he, too, was studying the executive order to see if it would impact the Israel trips. But he said “most of the other reforms are good government reforms and we are supportive of them.”

He welcomed in particular the measure that would require greater disclosure of initiative funding by legislators, known as member items.

“We are fully supportive of that transparency because we believe that the money our agencies get and the services they provide are extremely valuable. We think member items play a vital role because they fill gaps in services.”